I recently read this article which suggests that using blog posts as a basis for LinkedIn content marketing is basically spamming. Although I agree with much of what it says, I believe the issue is less to do with what people are putting on LinkedIn, and more to do with what they are putting on their blogs. If your blog simply contains promotional copy telling everyone how wonderful you are, they will lose interest very quickly. Good blog posts should be informative and should reinforce your position through demonstrating that you know your stuff and can help your clients. Personally I don’t see an issue with linking this type of copy to social media! So why do people post this type of “spammy” content on social networks? The simple answer is because it works (At least based on the way we are encouraged to measure success in these things). And herein lies the problem….. Content marketing analytics are almost entirely quantitative. Views, Engagement (measured by number of likes & comments etc). The principle is that if you can add it to a chart, then its a good metric! This approach may work for B2C and social metrics on Facebook etc. But in the B2B world things tend to be a bit less altruistic. Does this mean we are missing a trick? Using established approaches to analytics, to be a deemed a success your content marketing copy has to get a reaction, and if your audience view your B2B copy in a positive light they are less likely to react. this can mean that good, informative, unprovocative posts are likely to deliver less favourable metrics! This response is actually out of line with their value in the real world. As an example, let me take a linked Group (Business Peak District) that I moderate. This is a group dedicated to those doing business in and around the Peak District National Park in the UK, and members are predominantly SME businesses within the region. Most of the posts on this group are links to informative (hopefully) blog posts. Not surprisingly (as there is (intentionally) no real call to action) they get very few comments. I do however know that people find them of interest, because they tell me so. I also know that LinkedIn is no 3 on our websites referrers list, so it is driving traffic to our site. Traditional engagement stats would tend to suggest that these posts are not worth doing. However, through knowing what I am trying to achieve with them, and taking a broader, more joined-up view of their effect, I know they are. Now take another post on the group:
Free Social Media Lessons with SocialMyna. This is quite blatantly a promotion. The post itself delivers little value to the readers, other than informing them of the services offered by the poster’s company. In contrast to most posts on the group, this one had illicited comments from a second user, again blatantly using the comment to promote their services.
The post that inspired this article is “two ways to post blogs on linkedin that could get you banned“. According to that post, the SocialMyna post above should have been moved to the “promotions” area, but it wasn’t, and I will tell you why not. Assuming that promotions are relevant to the group they are targeted at, then I believe they have value. Marketing is about communication, and if you are running a business delivering a product or service, then you must think it delivers value to your target market. The issue I have is that posting ONLY promotional stuff on your blog or social media is bad marketing. The promotions do little or nothing to enhance your standing in the market, and do nothing to suggest why people should listen to/use you, and will not encourage people to come back to your blog in the future. They do however perform well based on the standard engagement stats. Mixing informative & promotional content will maximise the marketing benefit, enhance your brand position & sustainably deliver leads. However on this example the metrics culture only recognises the benefit of the promotional content. These posts are not moved to the promotions section because I believe this and other promotional “discussions” do add value to the group, informing them of what is going on in the area, and thus they are not spam. However it would deliver a more rounded and sustainable marketing message from the posters if they posted a mix of promotional and informative stuff. This said, on balance this group is better with these discussions than without them, so they stay in. If it appears that a contributor is abusing their status by posting nothing but promotional material then this can affect the core value proposition of the group and consequently action must be taken.




This week, e-consultancy published a list of reasons why someone would leave your website in 10 seconds, it could also have been entitled “Pet hates of website design”. Although I agree with everything on the list, I thought I would draw out those most relevant to our readers. Here are my top 6 : 

The final section to look at is the detailed insights page. To get to this page, simply click on the “xx followers” link next to the Follow button at the top right of the page, and then on the “See All Insights” link on the right hand side of the page. This will bring up a dashboard with detailed stats on all of your followers. A great feature of the internet is the feedback data you can get. You can really see how effective your marketing is being. The new LinkedIn stats definitely deliver in this respect.
After more than a quarter of a century in marketing (Scary), it still intrigues me that strategy and action are so often separated in business, particularly in the case of SMEs. The consultant helps you with your strategy but often has little involvement with delivering any action plan while marketing service suppliers are keen to deliver their services (design, web, print, communication etc) without any real reference to your strategy. Real success in marketing comes when a clear strategy is converted into a dynamic and well managed action plan. Strategy plus communication is what really works. In big corporates, this process is usually handled by a marketing team that that will ensure resources are effectively utilised to deliver marketing results in line with overall corporate objectives. In the world of SMEs, this “Marketing team” usually translates to “A Director” who does marketing amongst other things or or ‘a marketing person’ whose salary IS the marketing budget! “Your Marketing Department down the road” is an offer from a number of marketing agencies, but too often this translates as “Your Creative Department down the road“; well able to deliver great creatives, but again falling short of the goal of a “clear business strategy joined -up to a dynamic and well managed communication action plan.” At BSA we join-up strategy and communication in the real world to deliver: